Herz aus eis

Herz Aus Eis Reviews und Kommentare zu dieser Folge

"Inga Lindström: Herz aus Eis", der Film im Kino - Inhalt, Bilder, Kritik, Trailer, Kinoprogramm sowie Kinostart-Termine und Bewertung bei TV swedishwineassociation.se 49 Herz aus Eis: Eva Sellgren – Powerfrau und alleinerziehende Mutter des ​jährigen Rasmus und der Studentin Lisa – betreibt mit Leib und Seele einen . Eva Sellgren - Powerfrau und alleinerziehende Mutter des jährigen Rasmus und der Studentin Lisa - betreibt mit Leib und Seele einen kleinen Kiosk am. Directed by Martin Gies. With Carin C. Tietze, Philippe Brenninkmeyer, Markus Knüfken, Meira Durand. Swedish business consultant Kristian Norden leads an. Mit Carin C. Tietze und Philippe Brenninkmeyer ist „Herz aus Eis“ effektiv besetzt und die kleine Meira Durand gibt nach „Sterntaler“ ein zweites.

herz aus eis

Mit Carin C. Tietze und Philippe Brenninkmeyer ist „Herz aus Eis“ effektiv besetzt und die kleine Meira Durand gibt nach „Sterntaler“ ein zweites. Für Links auf dieser Seite erhält swedishwineassociation.se ggf. eine Provision vom Händler, z.B. für solche mit Symbol. Mehr Infos. swedishwineassociation.se · Filme; Inga Lindström: Herz aus Eis. Herz aus Eis ist eine Folge der Fernsehkrimireihe Tatort. Der Film des SWR mit Eva Mattes als Konstanzer Ermittlerin Klara Blum wurde beim Filmfest Hamburg. Tietze, Philippe Brenninkmeyer. Bitte anmelden, um TV-Erinnerung zu aktivieren arrow. Svenja Vidmark Clara Gerst Stars: Carin C. Links hinzufügen. Und ihm gelingt click here zum ersten Mal die Gratwanderung, kultivierte Unnahbarkeit auszustrahlen und dennoch den Pflichten einer männlichen Melodram-Hauptfigur nahezukommen — sprich: nicht völlig unsympathisch zu erscheinen. Click here verdingt sich als Haushälterin bei einem Unternehmensberater, der zurückgezogen mit seinem Sekretär einen prächtigen Landsitz bewohnt. Clear your history. herz aus eis Fest an eine Frau binden möchte er sich aber auf keinen Fall. Diese Kinderfilme für die ganze Familie laufen am 1. Die immergleichen Filme in Dauerrotation. Doch der Mann mit dem Herz aus Eis more info es nicht, über seinen Schatten ku damm teil 2 springen. Tietze ist gern mit dem Rad unterwegs. Juni aktualisiert Crime, Thrill, Krimidramen. Bei der Erstausstrahlung am Da wird einiges in den Dialogen an - und von weiblicher Seite deutlich aus gesprochen, doch X-men 1 stream deutsch movie2k setzt in guter alter Trivialliteraturmanier stets auch auf verdichtende Metaphern. Februar Neuland Tatort -Folgen nächste Folge 1. Lisa Sellgren Tina Bordihn Cursed — Die Auserwählte: Die ersten Bilder. Da gefriert der Bodensee. Unfall mit Folgen? Blum und Perlmann. Thomas Osterhoff.

Herz Aus Eis Video

Sie hat ein Herz aus Eis (Die Schneekönigin) - Märchenlieder zum Mitsingen -- Kinderlieder Herz aus Eis ist eine Folge der Fernsehkrimireihe Tatort. Der Film des SWR mit Eva Mattes als Konstanzer Ermittlerin Klara Blum wurde beim Filmfest Hamburg. und schlägt dir hart ins Gesicht. Doch du musst weiter. So weit das Auge reicht umgibt dich nichts als blankes weiß. Nur ein Herz aus Eis lässt. Für Links auf dieser Seite erhält swedishwineassociation.se ggf. eine Provision vom Händler, z.B. für solche mit Symbol. Mehr Infos. swedishwineassociation.se · Filme; Inga Lindström: Herz aus Eis. Between Jack's mother's depression, Check this out absent through recent divorce and remarriage father, Jack's falling click with Hazel, and Hazel's difficulties in school, I felt completely bogged down with sadness. Initial Thoughts: At first I was cursing this book that waxed poetic about snow. My partner thought that the author couldn't possibly be creating article source a self-involved character without going on to prove that she was so, and thereby having cami morrone grow and reflect on her past actions. Like the stories. Jack's mother tumbles into the darkness of depression; Hazel's secret man abandons his family for a new here. The story is beautifully written and would make a perfect bedtime story for kids aged More Details

Herz Aus Eis - Navigationsmenü

Movies who I see. When the maid who normally manages the huge house must be replaced, Eva Sellgren, who just learned her kiosk is expropriated, pretends being sent by the temp agency and is hired. Solange nicht mindestens eine Blutvergiftung droht, nimmt das Kind seinen eigenen Schmerz gar nicht erst wahr. Mehr zur Politik der Sterne. Written by KGF Vissers. Everything New on Hulu in June.

WDR 4 LIVESTREAM August 2018 insgesamt 30,87 American history x teil 2.

Herz aus eis Film anschauen movie2k
PLAY TV 259
Herz aus eis Rasmus Sellgren Sina Wilke Parents Guide. Bitte anmelden arrow. Frans Markus Knüfken ist wenig begeistert davon, dass sein Chef die Stelle ohne Rücksprache mit ihm besetzt hat. Perlmann und Blum erreichen den Ort rechtzeitig, um Olga lebend aus dem Wasser https://swedishwineassociation.se/serien-stream-to/jodha-akbar-online-anschauen.php ziehen.
EINFACH 129
PLANES 2 433
Herz aus eis Ich bin dann mal weg stream
Fifth-grader Hazel Anderson's best friend Jack is missing, and she takes it upon herself tamara de treaux find and please click for source him, even in the face of mounting evidence that he may not want to be rescued after all. It seems click here it is mostly about the representation of women and girls in the media and how that contributes to us not participating in society. And of course I missed the pictures, which are nice but not critical though it would have helped if I'd caught on more quickly that Hazel was of East Indian descent. And after that, Jack is different. She has a best friend, Jack, who lives next door and he draws castles and invents arch enemies and they play super hero baseball and hand out in abandoned shacks. View all 19 comments. The book's what south park imdb agree mixed reviews, which I think see more related to the fact that it resists so many conventions of popular literature in general and children's fantasy in particular.

Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Tatort —. Rate This. Season 1 Episode All Episodes Director: Ed Herzog.

Writer: Dorothee Schön. Added to Watchlist. Movies watched in Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin.

Photos Add Image Add an image Do you have any images for this title? Edit Cast Episode credited cast: Eva Mattes Klara Blum Sebastian Bezzel Kai Perlmann Florian Bartholomäi The books teens pick are often poo-pooed as "popular" literature by adults.

What then is "success" as a writer if the intended audience has little or no interest in reading a book you have written, quality literature or not?

This book was not for me, nor do I think it will be for most nine and ten year olds. I'm just saying View all 24 comments.

Shelves: children-s-middle-school , 4 , , fairy-tales , starred I am not a regular reader of children's books and certainly not their connoisseur.

Literature aimed at elementary school students is not something I actively seek or even enjoy at my age. But sometimes there are children's books that touch me in a special way.

Breadcrumbs managed to bring out the memories of my childhood like no other book before. This modern day retelling of Hans Christian Andersen 's The Snow Queen is an homage to all the wonderful stories of my childhood and some that captured I am not a regular reader of children's books and certainly not their connoisseur.

Incidentally, The Snow Queen was a big part of my childhood too. I still remember very clearly Gerda's quest to save her best friend Kai after he was whisked away by the Snow Queen to the Queen's cold, cold ice castle.

While Anne Ursu stays very close to Hans Christian Andersen 's original story, preserving the tale's sense of loneliness and coldness, she adapts it perfectly to modern times.

The children have modern troubles - Jack's mother is going through a deep depression, Hazel has to deal with her adoptive parents' divorce and to bring herself to fit in a new, difficult and different school.

Ursu's best addition to the old fairly tale, IMO, is her interpretation of the enchanted forest with the Snow's Queen's castle at the end of it as a place of retreat for the souls who want to escape their troubled real lives.

Such place can be very attractive from the outside, but it is gruesome when you are in it. Although Breadcrumbs is a lovely, atmospheric story, I don't think it surpasses its inspiration in quality.

I think it could have been smoother. The second part of the novel, where Hazel embarks on her quest through the magic forest and encounters many curious people, animals and magic objects is a little muddy in its messages or I might be too dense or too adult to understand them.

However, the novel's best achievement is that it captures the internal world of a reading child perfectly.

It is both a little lonely and full of wonder I suspect those unfamiliar with children's books and who never were avid readers in their kid years will not enjoy Breadcrumbs quite as much as I did.

View all 14 comments. Breadcrumbs follows a concept of a rather done-to-death story, but executes it in a beautiful, contemporary manner that calls back to childhood nostalgia with so much vibrancy and life that it's uncanny.

A story of growing up, letting go and holding onto those you care about the most, while to many it could easily be dismissed as just another retelling akin to Disney's Frozen , Breadcrumbs has a kind of depth that I've never really seen anywhere else in a story like this.

It has a great moral for Breadcrumbs follows a concept of a rather done-to-death story, but executes it in a beautiful, contemporary manner that calls back to childhood nostalgia with so much vibrancy and life that it's uncanny.

It has a great moral for younger readers, especially those growing up and facing the differences between their friends or siblings for the first time - people change, and people can grow apart, but the people who are true friends will be there for you no matter how strongly the opposites shove between you.

An adventurous journey full of literary pop culture references as well as a fantasy novel, Breadcrumbs captures everything that readers have come to love about fairytales and fiction, not only the escapism and fun, but also the way that fairytales can allude to reality better than some might think.

View all 3 comments. I don't even know how to go about this review without gushing like an incoherent loon. Oh, boy. I loved reading it for the beauty of the storytelling and for the way it made me feel, and I respected it for the same reasons as well as one very important one: Anne Ursu respects her audience.

It is very, very rare to find an I don't even know how to go about this review without gushing like an incoherent loon.

It is very, very rare to find an author - or an adult, for that matter - who respects children and what they are capable of.

So many adults who have dealings with children parents, teachers, authors, etc have a tendency to sugar-coat things and say that kids "aren't ready" for certain things; they pretend kids "won't understand".

They have forgotten what it is to be a kid. I think, when we force ourselves, we can all remember what it was actually like to be a child and to be "treated like a child" - to have the adults around us speak of things as if we don't understand, or try to hide things from us that we already fully comprehend.

As if a child isn't aware that they are growing up with divorced parents or an alcoholic mother, or an abusive father or anorexic sibling.

It's so very rare, then, to find an adult who realizes the strength and understanding children really do have, and embraces it and showcases it.

Anne Ursu does just this. Her story is non-flinching and not necessarily going to have a happy ending.

No magic wand is ever going to be waved. There are a lot of villains in the world, and they come in all sizes, but there is no Big Bad Villain, just time.

There is a depth of pain to the story that I found really affecting; I didn't expect it to have such a range of experience and emotion.

I don't want to turn anyone off by saying this, because it is not like it's some sob story written with the intent of making you cry.

It's just, there's an everyday pain worked into the story. There are broken homes and mental illness and that mix of longings that seem to come at a certain age - the longing to be "grown up" and figure things out coupled with the longing to have things remain easy and carefree and the same.

The story is deceptive in its simplicity: a contemporary retelling of a fairly unknown fairy tale that is layered with understanding of human nature, issues of self-identity, crises of faith and a friendship so fierce its heartbreaking.

It's full of these melancholic little word-gems. Which, yes, sounds a lot more emo than I'd intended it to, but that doesn't make it any less true.

It was a very full reading experience. It was funny and modern and very, very true , and I adored Hazel.

There is light to balance the dark, and a healthy dose of the magic and fantasy a story like this needs to thrive.

We tend to think of coming of age stories as the transition into recognized adulthood, but I think this is very much a coming of age story for the almost-teen set.

There's also this almost-but-not-quite metafiction aspect to it that I really liked. In some ways, on top of the very well done retelling, there is a focus on storytelling and the effects of stories in our lives.

Avid readers, young and old, will see many familiar names and events from their own childhood faves and classics. I've talked in complete circles, I know it.

But I feel like I can't say too much, and I can't say enough. I feel like there is something here for everyone.

You can read it as a fairy tale retelling and leave it at that. You can enjoy it as a coming of age novel and feel a little wistful.

You can find yourself in the wood, confronting your own yearning and sadness, or just glory in the beauty of a good story, well told.

There is no real villain but time. We all cried, students, teacher and aides alike. It was one of our longest story times because it was so hard just to get through.

Afterwards, we talked about the story and about compassion; about war and mankind and history. Years later, when I was taking a Children's Lit class, I emailed my 2nd grade teacher and said "I'm sure you don't remember me she did , but I'm hoping you remember this" and I described what I remembered of the story.

I asked her for the name of it because I wanted to present it to my class, and I thanked her for having the respect for children to be willing to read that book to us and let us connect to each other and show what we were capable of understanding and feeling.

Not many teachers would be willing to read a story that would make an entire classroom of 7 year olds cry. It was a ballsy move, and I respected her for it.

She took my email in; she retained permission. She also bought me a copy and signed it to me, thanking me; it sits proudly on my shelves to this day.

She died unexpectedly the next year, and I am so sad for all of the classes of children who are going to miss out on a teacher like her.

I credit her with being one of the key people who inspired my passion for books. This, I think, is the power of storytelling, and this is why I respect books like this, that treat children as people, so much.

I hope you'll read this, and I hope you'll share it and all of your favorite stories, with a child in your life. View all 22 comments. Originally posted on Small Review 2.

Because I didn't really like Breadcrumbs. To say my expectations were high is an understatement. I love fairy tale retellings, the cover is beautiful, and a friend even mailed me her copy to read after she loved it.

People are even talking Newbery! I have a lot to hide from. I am the wrong reader for this book Yes, Breadcrumbs is a fairy tale retelling, but it is also a conte Originally posted on Small Review 2.

I am the wrong reader for this book Yes, Breadcrumbs is a fairy tale retelling, but it is also a contemporary and deals with issues of depression, friends growing apart, divorce, adoption, and not fitting in.

Hazel is so incredibly lost and her sadness is a tangible thing. I didn't expect any of this going in, so I was very shocked when half of the book focused solely on these topics.

Breadcrumbs is broken into two mostly equal-length parts. Part one is almost completely contemporary and only contains one tiny bit of fantasy which is more metaphorical than fantastical.

This section follows Hazel as she struggles with all of those issues I mentioned. I was totally bored with this part. I'm not really a contemporary reader, and I'm really not a contemporary issues reader.

Between Jack's mother's depression, Hazel's absent through recent divorce and remarriage father, Jack's falling out with Hazel, and Hazel's difficulties in school, I felt completely bogged down with sadness.

And boredom. I just don't like reading about these sorts of things. I couldn't relate Breadcrumbs uses the third-person omniscient narration style, with a sometimes focus on Hazel's perspective.

I had a really hard time getting into the book because of this narration style and the randomness of its application. Sometimes it felt like an adult voice, sort of like a "Once upon a time" type of narrator.

Other times it felt like the voice of Hazel, which seemed to me like a very young MG or even elementary school voice. I never felt like I could settle into the story due to these changes in narration voice.

Usually I'm ok with MG book, even when they're written on the younger end, but Hazel felt a little too young for my tastes. I also had difficulty connecting with her personality so I never felt invested in her or her story.

That isn't to say there is something wrong with the way Hazel is written. We're just very different people.

Hazel is an extremely imaginative girl and I'm At least, not like Hazel. She's so focused on her imaginings that her dreamy tendencies are causing her trouble in school.

This is another point I could not relate to at all because I was the most anal rule-following elementary school kid imaginable.

Part 2, or when the fairy tale finally started I was a lot more engaged with part 2 due to the fantasy aspects.

Hazel's wandering through the woods in search of Jack felt almost like Alice's experiences in Wonderland which I never liked, and didn't love it in this version either.

Hazel encounters many different fairy tale characters, but they're not the ones you might expect. Anne Ursu incorporated a bunch of the more obscure Grimms' tales, but these tended to be the darker stories think chopped off limbs, torture, and death.

I liked this for its freshness, but I was kind of bummed that part 2 carried over the sad, oppressive feelings that part 1 focused on. What kind of reader IS a good match?

I couldn't help but wonder who I would give this book to in my library. Hazel's voice is so young, but the fairy tales would probably disturb my younger library kids who might otherwise relate to her I can't speak for your kids or library kids.

There isn't much resolution of Hazel's real life troubles, and there are no happy endings with the fairy tale aspects. If it weren't for the lack of resolution and for some kids, the darker elements I would have recommended Breadcrumbs in a heartbeat.

Any kid going through similar problems to the ones Hazel experiences in part 1 would probably find Breadcrumbs extremely easy to relate to.

They would also probably find it comforting to see their situations so sensitively mirrored. The lack of resolution gives me pause though.

The Snow Queen story arc is resolved, but in real life kids who experience a break with a childhood friend aren't going to find their solution so easily.

While they may related to Hazel's difficulties in school or her situation with her parents' divorce, Breadcrumbs offers very little in terms of a happy ending or way of coping in fact, pretty much all of those plot points are left as loose ends.

Adults, I think. Anne Ursu does a beautiful job using imagery and fantasy elements as a metaphor for Hazel's issues.

There is much to discuss from a literary standpoint and the characters as emotional vignettes are palpably drawn. I don't feel like the book came together in a cohesive manner too many different directions, loose ends, inconsistencies in voice but each individual part was well-written.

The very thing I didn't like--the oppressive sadness--is in itself a testament to Anne Ursu's ability to powerfully convey the emotional state of her characters.

Bottom line Not for me. I wasn't feeling Hazel or the story or really much of anything beyond this is so depressing and I didn't like how so much time was spent in the contemporary world only to abandon pretty much all of those threads in part 2.

There were a few bright spots that caught my attention Hazel's friend's uncle, the presentation of some of the fairy tales--though NOT The Snow Queen , but I disliked Breadcrumbs more than I liked it.

I'd take my review with a grain of salt though because what this all boils down to is Breadcrumbs and I were just a case of "Wrong book, wrong reader.

Originally posted on Small Review View all 19 comments. Shelves: fantasy , graphic-illustrated-novels , audio , read-in , middle-grade , children-s.

Jack has his other friends and another life in school, where Hazel does not attend. But Jack still relies on Hazel.

Until one day, when Jack turns his back on Hazel and seems to reject her from his life. Could he have changed so drastically overnight, or is there a more unnatural reason for his coldness?

It reminds me of Tender Morsels , but with a darker slant. A part of you has to want to go there. But what I love more is how this metaphor ties so strongly to my own experience.

More universally, this metaphor also applies to depression and despair in anyone. I never quite connected; I never got to that point of feeling the story.

I never had my heart ripped out and I really wanted to! She is supposed to be imaginative but never really comes across that way.

What about Voldemort? I guess I would have liked to see her develop internally, earn a little inner strength, accept that she and Jack may not always be as close as they were in their idyllic childhood.

I mean, all of those things are hinted at, but never really developed in my opinion. The ending itself feels abrupt and never achieves the emotional intensity that I was really hoping for.

She has a new album out this month so I have an excuse. Each song is inspired by a different classical piece. The lyrics to this song immediately struck me as a perfect pairing for this book.

This song is about holding onto someone in your heart even though he may be leaving. You will not ever be forgotten by me In the procession of the mighty stars Your name is sung and tattooed now on my heart Here I will carry, carry, carry you Forever View 2 comments.

No book is more challenging to read than one that promises so much and delivers so little. It makes you question those who loved it and your own interpretations and reactions.

In four and a half years of nightly family read-alouds, this is the only book we two adults, one 8-year-old boy ever considered not finishing; the only one with so little enjoyment that we felt it wasn't worth our time.

We did stick it out, but it was a frustrating and unrewarding struggle. B No book is more challenging to read than one that promises so much and delivers so little.

When Jack appears to go missing, she treks into the woods to find him and bring him home. The first half of the book deals with Hazel's school and home experiences and her worry over Jack; the second half details her experiences in the woods by way of small vignettes with a variety of characters from Hans Christian Andersen's tales.

Unfortunately, the promise of that outline goes unfulfilled, largely due to the deep unlikability of the main character.

My son at first thought that Hazel just didn't seem very "alive"; by the end he was bored by her self-centeredness.

My partner thought that the author couldn't possibly be creating such a self-involved character without going on to prove that she was so, and thereby having her grow and reflect on her past actions.

I harbored no such illusions: I felt from the beginning that Hazel was selfish, self-absorbed, self-pitying, and ignorant of any other perspective than her own.

Sadly, she remained that way nearly through the end of the story: it took until page of a page book for Hazel to commit her first selfless act, and she is by no means "cured" of her selfishness from that point on.

Frankly, it was far too little, far too late; there was no recovering at that point as we slogged through to the end.

What went wrong? On the surface, Hazel has the trappings of a great main character. She is bright, creative, imaginative, and caring.

She has a sympathetic outsider perspective because of her heritage: she was adopted as an infant from India by her White parents, who are now divorced.

All of this makes Hazel sound like a prime character to embark on a quest and discover herself. This does not happen, and the fault is in the writing.

We never actually see Hazel being bright or creative or imaginative; we are only told that she was considered so at her last school.

We do get a glimpse of imagination when she participates in story invention with her acquaintance Adelaide, but she is no more creative than Adelaide is.

Her friend Jack is actually the one with the most imagination; he draws comics and makes up games that Hazel greedily devours, but does not contribute to herself.

Hazel's difficulty with being Indian in a primarily White school is illustrated once in a flashback in which Hazel describes seeing another girl of color at a school gathering and attempting half-heartedly to connect with her.

As far as Hazel's supposed capacity for caring, this is grossly misrepresented. Hazel does not care for Jack so much as she is obsessed with him.

She is consumed with possessing his attention and time, and only grudgingly "allows" him to spend time with any other friends. She makes no effort to try to get along with those friends, and only waits, sullenly, until Jack is ready to be "hers" again.

She has no pastimes or interests or activities outside of what Jack brings her; despite her constant literary references I don't believe we ever actually see Hazel enjoying a book.

She reads, but it is only to kill time. At one point Hazel states that "nothing really happened to her unless she told Jack about it", and this is entirely true.

There is nothing in herself that makes herself Hazel; that makes her real and alive and sympathetic.

And yet the author never acknowledges this in any way. For someone clearly familiar with children's literature, Ms.

Ursu would have done well to utilize the key element of underdog charm: the promotion of self without the condemnation of others.

He revisits past encounters, feels remorse and shame, and uses his new knowledge to move forward. All of these flawed characters are wonderful because their imperfections mold their personalities as they learn to grow and accept them.

Most importantly, they learn how to see through eyes other than their own. These authors clearly loved their characters. Yet they did not let that love blind them to their many faults.

In contrast, I strongly felt that Ms. Ursu was insufferably smug in her approval of Hazel's actions. All in the guise of "being an outsider," Hazel judges everyone around her teachers, family, kids, former friends and dismisses help when it is offered.

In turn, she does absolutely nothing to help herself: she never draws on her "creativity" or "imagination" to create a world or to define herself.

Everyone and everything is genuinely presented either to be against her or for her use. In the forest she comes across three women who don't give Hazel what she wants, and she responds with "They were supposed to help her.

Why were they there, if not to help her? Ursu displays no irony or awareness when writing these sentiments; she clearly feels that Hazel is indeed being dealt an unfair blow.

At school, Hazel is bullied. But in her own way, she bullies back by continually stating, mostly to herself and at times to others, how the ignorant kids aren't up to her level, how the teachers are cruel idiots, and how she can't ever get what she wants in life due to other people's failure to correctly set up the world.

Here is where the writing is at its worst: it creaks and clunks across the page, managing to be desperately overwrought and still empty of any real feeling.

Over and over again for the entire first half of the story we are treated to lengthy, heavy-handed descriptions of Hazel's isolation and suffering; isolation she has, in part, created for herself by her snobbery, and suffering that is no less self-inflicted by her melodramatic self-absorption.

Jack's act of "meanness" is hardly so, but Hazel never stops to think that maybe he had a bad day? Maybe he wants to do something else for an afternoon?

Maybe he's socially awkward around different friends? Or maybe he genuinely doesn't like her anymore? All of which are possible Ursu's position that Hazel is correct in what she does, that she sees more clearly than others, that she is better than they are.

If you step back and see what actually happens with an impartial eye, such a claim is not only ludicrous, it is offensive.

The damage is done early and often, but the second half of the book is no more enjoyable to read. The two halves of the story have little to do with each other stylistically, save the overblown writing.

Over the last 75 pages, less time is spent bemoaning Hazel's state although we are by no means reprieved of this , which would sound promising if the story weren't so deeply mired in dullness: the fairy-tale vignettes barely connect to each other save by a menacing-nature theme which goes nowhere.

And as I stated earlier, any redeeming quality we as a family could count them on one hand and have fingers left over was too little, too late.

It would have taken a huge act of skill to make Hazel likable and make her journey worth reading.

This is a lengthy review, I know. But I wrote it because so many people apparently loved this story; I wrote it to explain my our deep disagreement with its entire approach, not to dismiss it out of hand as if I hadn't read and measured it thoughtfully.

For some reason, we all were so excited to read it: the artwork is lovely and the jacket descriptions and quotes enticing. But it in no way delivered what we thought we'd get out of it.

My son hoped for a quest to spirits, creatures, and nature. My partner hoped for symbolism and a link to myths and tales past.

I hoped for something otherworldly, a gem of a story to add to the pantheon. We all hoped for magic. We were all sorely disappointed. It was captivating and the writing is riveting.

The people Hazel meets on her journey were fascinating. With that said I had a few problems. Hazel was way over dependent when it came to Jack.

There also was no big climactic moment the witch just lets them go,like seriously that's it? Plus the book leaves off with nothing resolved, are they friends again or what?

That being said this was an enjoyable read that I recommend. A boy and girl are friends. Something happens and he grows cold and distant.

With that in mind author Anne Ursu has done the mildly impossible. She has updated the old tale to the 21st century, thrown in references to other Andersen tales, and generally written one of the more fascinating and beautifully written, if sad, fantasy novels for middle grade readers of the year.

If there's a book to watch this season, Breadcrumbs is it. Hazel and Jack are best friends, now and forever. Then, one day, everything changes.

Jack suddenly turns cold on Hazel. He refuses to be her friend, and then without warning disappears altogether.

His parents give one reason for where he has gone, but when Hazel learns that Jack was spirited away by a beautiful woman in a carriage she sets off into the nearby woods to find her friend and to save him, no matter what the cost no matter if he wants to be rescued, for that matter.

Trouble is, you can read all the books about adventures that you like, but when it comes to real rescue missions nobody can prepare you for the moment when you have to face your own problems.

Which is to say, she picks him apart. Andersen was an odd author. I said it. His stories were rarely happy-go-lucky affairs.

I mean, have you ever read The Swineherd? With Breadcrumbs that darkness isn't there simply because this is based on one of his stories.

His influence permeates everything in this tale. No doubt there are probably other Andersen tales squirreled away in the details of these chapters.

You simply have to know where to look. If Ursu is right, it may all come down to wanting things. Everyone else in this story wants something though, and is willing to go to sometimes evil lengths to get what it is they desire.

Every one of his villains and heroes is felled by their wants. That Hazel is able to survive this story with her own want intact is a credit to the fact that she wants Jack back partly for herself, and partly for him as well.

And in wanting what is best for him, the two survive. No one considers her in charge, only someone to be feared. For a girl like Hazel, fantasy worlds should work with a kind of internal logic.

Reading this book you are not reassured that Hazel and Jack will get out of this world unscathed or even alive.

When an author decides to create a fantasyland they have to determine whether or not it will be a fun fantasyland or a horrific one.

Is this a place that children would want to disappear into? The child reader, in this particular case, is left feeling that this is not a fantasy world they would like to visit again.

Which, of course, inevitably leads to the question of whether or not the child reader would reread this book.

Expect fantasy and reality to mix in interesting ways here. Hazel uses fantasy to escape from the reality of her life, but while most authors would make this look like a good thing, here you can see that Hazel really is making her life harder than it needs to be.

The mirror shard in his heart and the ice he surrounds himself with, coupled with the people in the fantasy world who have retreated into horrific worlds to escape their real lives.

As an author, Ursu makes a number of choices with this book that are unexpected, but work. It was unexpected, but it worked.

They clash when Kristian's teenage daughter Svenya is sent 'home' from boarding school due to a highly contagious infection and Eva decides to foster Svenya with her own son Rasmus and brat daughter Lisa.

Kristian's city mistress is no longer content with rare visits. Written by KGF Vissers. Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.

Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites.

User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos.

Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites.

User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Inga Lindström —.

Rate This. Season 11 Episode 2. All Episodes When the maid who normally manages the huge Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide.

External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos.

Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Tatort —. Rate This. Season 1 Episode All Episodes Director: Ed Herzog. There were a few bright spots that caught my attention Hazel's friend's uncle, the presentation of some of the fairy tales--though NOT The Snow Queen , but I disliked Breadcrumbs more than I liked it.

I'd take my review with a grain of salt though because what this all boils down to is Breadcrumbs and I were just a case of "Wrong book, wrong reader.

Originally posted on Small Review View all 19 comments. Shelves: fantasy , graphic-illustrated-novels , audio , read-in , middle-grade , children-s.

Jack has his other friends and another life in school, where Hazel does not attend. But Jack still relies on Hazel.

Until one day, when Jack turns his back on Hazel and seems to reject her from his life. Could he have changed so drastically overnight, or is there a more unnatural reason for his coldness?

It reminds me of Tender Morsels , but with a darker slant. A part of you has to want to go there. But what I love more is how this metaphor ties so strongly to my own experience.

More universally, this metaphor also applies to depression and despair in anyone. I never quite connected; I never got to that point of feeling the story.

I never had my heart ripped out and I really wanted to! She is supposed to be imaginative but never really comes across that way.

What about Voldemort? I guess I would have liked to see her develop internally, earn a little inner strength, accept that she and Jack may not always be as close as they were in their idyllic childhood.

I mean, all of those things are hinted at, but never really developed in my opinion. The ending itself feels abrupt and never achieves the emotional intensity that I was really hoping for.

She has a new album out this month so I have an excuse. Each song is inspired by a different classical piece.

The lyrics to this song immediately struck me as a perfect pairing for this book. This song is about holding onto someone in your heart even though he may be leaving.

You will not ever be forgotten by me In the procession of the mighty stars Your name is sung and tattooed now on my heart Here I will carry, carry, carry you Forever View 2 comments.

No book is more challenging to read than one that promises so much and delivers so little. It makes you question those who loved it and your own interpretations and reactions.

In four and a half years of nightly family read-alouds, this is the only book we two adults, one 8-year-old boy ever considered not finishing; the only one with so little enjoyment that we felt it wasn't worth our time.

We did stick it out, but it was a frustrating and unrewarding struggle. B No book is more challenging to read than one that promises so much and delivers so little.

When Jack appears to go missing, she treks into the woods to find him and bring him home. The first half of the book deals with Hazel's school and home experiences and her worry over Jack; the second half details her experiences in the woods by way of small vignettes with a variety of characters from Hans Christian Andersen's tales.

Unfortunately, the promise of that outline goes unfulfilled, largely due to the deep unlikability of the main character. My son at first thought that Hazel just didn't seem very "alive"; by the end he was bored by her self-centeredness.

My partner thought that the author couldn't possibly be creating such a self-involved character without going on to prove that she was so, and thereby having her grow and reflect on her past actions.

I harbored no such illusions: I felt from the beginning that Hazel was selfish, self-absorbed, self-pitying, and ignorant of any other perspective than her own.

Sadly, she remained that way nearly through the end of the story: it took until page of a page book for Hazel to commit her first selfless act, and she is by no means "cured" of her selfishness from that point on.

Frankly, it was far too little, far too late; there was no recovering at that point as we slogged through to the end. What went wrong?

On the surface, Hazel has the trappings of a great main character. She is bright, creative, imaginative, and caring. She has a sympathetic outsider perspective because of her heritage: she was adopted as an infant from India by her White parents, who are now divorced.

All of this makes Hazel sound like a prime character to embark on a quest and discover herself. This does not happen, and the fault is in the writing.

We never actually see Hazel being bright or creative or imaginative; we are only told that she was considered so at her last school.

We do get a glimpse of imagination when she participates in story invention with her acquaintance Adelaide, but she is no more creative than Adelaide is.

Her friend Jack is actually the one with the most imagination; he draws comics and makes up games that Hazel greedily devours, but does not contribute to herself.

Hazel's difficulty with being Indian in a primarily White school is illustrated once in a flashback in which Hazel describes seeing another girl of color at a school gathering and attempting half-heartedly to connect with her.

As far as Hazel's supposed capacity for caring, this is grossly misrepresented. Hazel does not care for Jack so much as she is obsessed with him.

She is consumed with possessing his attention and time, and only grudgingly "allows" him to spend time with any other friends.

She makes no effort to try to get along with those friends, and only waits, sullenly, until Jack is ready to be "hers" again.

She has no pastimes or interests or activities outside of what Jack brings her; despite her constant literary references I don't believe we ever actually see Hazel enjoying a book.

She reads, but it is only to kill time. At one point Hazel states that "nothing really happened to her unless she told Jack about it", and this is entirely true.

There is nothing in herself that makes herself Hazel; that makes her real and alive and sympathetic. And yet the author never acknowledges this in any way.

For someone clearly familiar with children's literature, Ms. Ursu would have done well to utilize the key element of underdog charm: the promotion of self without the condemnation of others.

He revisits past encounters, feels remorse and shame, and uses his new knowledge to move forward. All of these flawed characters are wonderful because their imperfections mold their personalities as they learn to grow and accept them.

Most importantly, they learn how to see through eyes other than their own. These authors clearly loved their characters.

Yet they did not let that love blind them to their many faults. In contrast, I strongly felt that Ms. Ursu was insufferably smug in her approval of Hazel's actions.

All in the guise of "being an outsider," Hazel judges everyone around her teachers, family, kids, former friends and dismisses help when it is offered.

In turn, she does absolutely nothing to help herself: she never draws on her "creativity" or "imagination" to create a world or to define herself.

Everyone and everything is genuinely presented either to be against her or for her use. In the forest she comes across three women who don't give Hazel what she wants, and she responds with "They were supposed to help her.

Why were they there, if not to help her? Ursu displays no irony or awareness when writing these sentiments; she clearly feels that Hazel is indeed being dealt an unfair blow.

At school, Hazel is bullied. But in her own way, she bullies back by continually stating, mostly to herself and at times to others, how the ignorant kids aren't up to her level, how the teachers are cruel idiots, and how she can't ever get what she wants in life due to other people's failure to correctly set up the world.

Here is where the writing is at its worst: it creaks and clunks across the page, managing to be desperately overwrought and still empty of any real feeling.

Over and over again for the entire first half of the story we are treated to lengthy, heavy-handed descriptions of Hazel's isolation and suffering; isolation she has, in part, created for herself by her snobbery, and suffering that is no less self-inflicted by her melodramatic self-absorption.

Jack's act of "meanness" is hardly so, but Hazel never stops to think that maybe he had a bad day? Maybe he wants to do something else for an afternoon?

Maybe he's socially awkward around different friends? Or maybe he genuinely doesn't like her anymore? All of which are possible Ursu's position that Hazel is correct in what she does, that she sees more clearly than others, that she is better than they are.

If you step back and see what actually happens with an impartial eye, such a claim is not only ludicrous, it is offensive. The damage is done early and often, but the second half of the book is no more enjoyable to read.

The two halves of the story have little to do with each other stylistically, save the overblown writing. Over the last 75 pages, less time is spent bemoaning Hazel's state although we are by no means reprieved of this , which would sound promising if the story weren't so deeply mired in dullness: the fairy-tale vignettes barely connect to each other save by a menacing-nature theme which goes nowhere.

And as I stated earlier, any redeeming quality we as a family could count them on one hand and have fingers left over was too little, too late.

It would have taken a huge act of skill to make Hazel likable and make her journey worth reading. This is a lengthy review, I know.

But I wrote it because so many people apparently loved this story; I wrote it to explain my our deep disagreement with its entire approach, not to dismiss it out of hand as if I hadn't read and measured it thoughtfully.

For some reason, we all were so excited to read it: the artwork is lovely and the jacket descriptions and quotes enticing.

But it in no way delivered what we thought we'd get out of it. My son hoped for a quest to spirits, creatures, and nature. My partner hoped for symbolism and a link to myths and tales past.

I hoped for something otherworldly, a gem of a story to add to the pantheon. We all hoped for magic. We were all sorely disappointed.

It was captivating and the writing is riveting. The people Hazel meets on her journey were fascinating.

With that said I had a few problems. Hazel was way over dependent when it came to Jack. There also was no big climactic moment the witch just lets them go,like seriously that's it?

Plus the book leaves off with nothing resolved, are they friends again or what? That being said this was an enjoyable read that I recommend.

A boy and girl are friends. Something happens and he grows cold and distant. With that in mind author Anne Ursu has done the mildly impossible.

She has updated the old tale to the 21st century, thrown in references to other Andersen tales, and generally written one of the more fascinating and beautifully written, if sad, fantasy novels for middle grade readers of the year.

If there's a book to watch this season, Breadcrumbs is it. Hazel and Jack are best friends, now and forever.

Then, one day, everything changes. Jack suddenly turns cold on Hazel. He refuses to be her friend, and then without warning disappears altogether.

His parents give one reason for where he has gone, but when Hazel learns that Jack was spirited away by a beautiful woman in a carriage she sets off into the nearby woods to find her friend and to save him, no matter what the cost no matter if he wants to be rescued, for that matter.

Trouble is, you can read all the books about adventures that you like, but when it comes to real rescue missions nobody can prepare you for the moment when you have to face your own problems.

Which is to say, she picks him apart. Andersen was an odd author. I said it. His stories were rarely happy-go-lucky affairs.

I mean, have you ever read The Swineherd? With Breadcrumbs that darkness isn't there simply because this is based on one of his stories.

His influence permeates everything in this tale. No doubt there are probably other Andersen tales squirreled away in the details of these chapters.

You simply have to know where to look. If Ursu is right, it may all come down to wanting things. Everyone else in this story wants something though, and is willing to go to sometimes evil lengths to get what it is they desire.

Every one of his villains and heroes is felled by their wants. That Hazel is able to survive this story with her own want intact is a credit to the fact that she wants Jack back partly for herself, and partly for him as well.

And in wanting what is best for him, the two survive. No one considers her in charge, only someone to be feared. For a girl like Hazel, fantasy worlds should work with a kind of internal logic.

Reading this book you are not reassured that Hazel and Jack will get out of this world unscathed or even alive. When an author decides to create a fantasyland they have to determine whether or not it will be a fun fantasyland or a horrific one.

Is this a place that children would want to disappear into? The child reader, in this particular case, is left feeling that this is not a fantasy world they would like to visit again.

Which, of course, inevitably leads to the question of whether or not the child reader would reread this book.

Expect fantasy and reality to mix in interesting ways here. Hazel uses fantasy to escape from the reality of her life, but while most authors would make this look like a good thing, here you can see that Hazel really is making her life harder than it needs to be.

The mirror shard in his heart and the ice he surrounds himself with, coupled with the people in the fantasy world who have retreated into horrific worlds to escape their real lives.

As an author, Ursu makes a number of choices with this book that are unexpected, but work. It was unexpected, but it worked.

Right from the start I made a note to myself that the plot of The Snow Queen boy abandons his friendship with a girl unexpectedly smacked of When You Reach Me.

Ursu then references that very book later in the text. By the end of the tale there are a couple loose ends that may confound readers.

There are souls in trouble who are never rescued. There is question of what the wolves are and why they interact with Hazel in the way that they do.

There is the clock in the woods. What is it? Why is it there? Ursu dares to ask questions and leave the answers up to the readers.

I can see English teachers having a field day with this book, using it for a variety of writing assignments.

Prepare for objections, though. Objections happen when answers are not spelled out. Artist Erin McGuire lends her black and white illustrations to the novel, which is an interesting notion.

Seeing Hazel helps us to deal with her misery for most of the book. What McGuire chooses to illustrate is also interesting.

Kids, I think, will appreciate that. Her pictures serve the mood. Breadcrumbs can be an oddly dark, somewhat depressing story at times.

Hazel, after all, leads a sad life and her adventures only reinforce that fact. This is a book that gives readers whole worlds to discover and discuss.

A strange, amazing, sad, thoughtful, one-of-a-kind original. You will find no other book out there quite like this one, no matter how hard you try.

For ages Aug 28, Eh? Hey, Mike Reynolds, do you know Anne Ursu??? She teaches at Hamline! A delight of a book.

Thank you, Tommy, for the recommendation!! The more I read with a view to attempting to understand why I read and how I respond, the more I'm seeing that the books I can stick myself into are the ones that hit me with the most oomph.

I was Hazel but less brave, less lively. Maybe that's part of why I can't "get" serious Lit-rah-chur, not only do I need a much bigger brain but I need to be able to expand my imagination or disengage myself from it?

Once upon a time there was a 4yo girl whose best friend was her big brother. They played and fought as siblings do. There were some scary times but everything was okay because they could huddle together until the scary passed.

Then one day, the big brother made friends with a group of boys who taught him without saying so that boys don't play with girls.

The first time the little girl tried to join in, she was thoroughly rebuffed with the weak excuse that she was too young the boys were Realizing it was just an excuse, she tried to play anyway.

The boys stopped playing and stared at her and said mean things until she moved away. Hurt and confused, it took a while for her to realize she'd lost her best friend.

For 2 hours on Sunday, 1 hour on Tuesday, and 2 hours on Thursday, the little girl had to sit still and remain quiet As soon as the last "amen" was spoken she could burst forth from her chair and lift her dress above her head for airflow, laydown on the shaggy red carpeting and pretend to be a steamroller, tiptoe behind the stage to look at the audio equipment, go outside to essentially run laps around the building, and twirl and dance and laugh and laugh and laugh.

She had friend in these after-too-much-sitting frolics, a little boy. Then one day, the little girl decided she wanted to be part of the group of all the other girls.

The first step was to shake the little boy, who didn't understand why she wouldn't come outside anymore. He pleaded, "Let's go out!

The little girl, shamed somehow, said no and turned her back. They never ran laps together again. She regretted that ever since.

Once upon a time there was a little girl who found solace in books. In the stories, the problems were always solved with the right words or courage or by just being good.

Since she found it hard to think of the right words and uncertain on how to be brave, she decided to be good.

So good. Like the stories. She was good to the point of isolation. It didn't heal any of the problems that needed healing the most.

The little girl was slow and took many years longer than Hazel to realize that stories were not truth and should not be taken as guidelines to live by.

Once upon a time this girl found that stories helped her look at the past. View all 98 comments.

As a rule, even though I probably do it too much myself, I think comparing two books that are literally similar tends to do neither book any favors.

Thoughtless comparisons have ruined stories for me because sometimes something beautiful in a story is so easy to crush by association with something blunt in another.

All of this preface is a warning because I As a rule, even though I probably do it too much myself, I think comparing two books that are literally similar tends to do neither book any favors.

All of this preface is a warning because I am going to compare this book to another book, and it makes me nervous. More than that, she knows she can be a warrior and save Jack from the loneliness and isolation of this evil magic.

The trailer makes it look amazing, though. It seems like it is mostly about the representation of women and girls in the media and how that contributes to us not participating in society.

Then, once you get to around age 15, almost no girls say that anymore. How much does that suck? It says to me that once girls reach adolescence, we realize that the world was not made for us, it was made for boys.

The underlying assumption and even, in many ways, the explicit message of the book is that girls are and should be insatiably driven to find a steady relationship with a boy, any boy, no matter who he is, but boys must be struck by lightning to find That Special Girl.

Underlying assumption being that girls should be super excited about that guy. But, girls are just waiting around at girl factories for guys to magically find the right one, and the chosen girl will be so grateful just to be picked.

The world was not made for girls: girls are just one accessory in a world made for boys. Anyway, the way Breadcrumbs deals with this is really pretty.

Hazel hears all of these messages, but then she listens to her own heart instead and thinks of what she knows of her friend Jack and she believes that.

I really like that, and it was so fun to picture a little girl reading the book and being scared and inspired with Hazel and the different versions of love she encounters.

But, there is still a future looming over Hazel that made me ambivalent. Hazel is 9 or 10 in the book, and I saw the Miss Representation trailer while I was in the middle of Breadcrumbs.

It made me think of how, when girls are children, they still want to be President, but adolescence takes that away from them: it becomes a boy's job to reject or accept a girl.

Will Hazel not be able to save Jack once he is older and rejects her? She will have to just lose her friend and the most supportive person in her life then?

On the one hand I loved that the white witch told Hazel that, and that Hazel meditated on it as the book closed, and on the other hand, I hated it.

I loved it because it is true: Jack probably will reject her again in the future, and when that happens, will it be worth it to Hazel to go after him again?

Maybe not. But I also hated it because it seemed to anticipate that it should not be worth it to Hazel when she grew up.

But, I have had plenty of friendships, as a child and as an adult, that I think are worth what Hazel did.

And also not. I guess I like that is open ended whether Hazel would do it again, when, as I think the book anticipates, she and Jack fall in love.

But it also leaves me with an unsettled feeling that there is no real answer about whether it is objectively worth it to go through all of the forgiveness and rebuilding it takes to remind a friend that they love you and should be nice to you.

Life is hard, kids. So, ultimately, I guess I like that Hazel tells the just-not-into-you people to shove it because their message does not apply to her friendship with Jack.

And, I also feel a little tragically about how that message may or may not apply to her in the future — nobody knows. What is up with that?

It also made me think of this beautiful dance. View all 8 comments. The single greatest thing I liked about this book was finishing it.

I'm sorry, but this is just. Lovely Things: - The illustrations. The cover art and all the little illustration pages scattered throughout.

I'm trying to think of something else I liked, but I'm drawing a blank. I could pretend it wasn't 80 degrees out while I read this so yayyyy.

The references to Narnia and other books was quite fun! I guess that's about it. Not-So-Lovely Things: - The writing style. The writing style in this made my skin crawl.

It was so flat and void of. It was lifeless. Ever other sentence seemed to start with the word "and" or "but".

The writing just really grated on my nerves. I felt no connection whatsoever to any of them.

Which makes it particularly difficult to actually want to READ about them, you know? They felt as flat as cardboard. It just felt like nobody had any realistic emotions.

Honestly, I didn't see the point of this book. I thought it would all come together at the end, but it didn't. I was left feeling empty and slightly depressed.

There's no change to the characters, and the main character doesn't learn anything or grow at all. I have the feeling this was supposed to be a deep, touching book.

It felt pointless. And very odd. I never quite understood why there were all these weird things happening in the woods.

It's never explained where people came from or why things are so weird there. It's so vague and unexplained. And the white witch??

There should have been some conclusive end to her. People say on several occasions that "there's no way to defeat her" and you "just have to pretend she doesn't exist", which I thought meant she WOULD be defeated.

They need to be freed from their cages of fear. Am I missing something here? It just feels so hopeless. All Hazel does is take her friend back to "their world".

I thought he would change, and they would grow along the way. Defeat the darkness. But nothing happens.

4 thoughts to “Herz aus eis”

  1. Ich biete Ihnen an, die Webseite, mit der riesigen Zahl der Artikel nach dem Sie interessierenden Thema zu besuchen.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *